Re: Another load path idea

[Marius Vollmer]

Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

> I'd personally like to have this in 1.8.  Any objections?

Hmm, I'm inclined not to put this into 1.8, at least not in 1.8.0.  I
can't really put my finger on it, as I see nothing fundamental wrong
with the patch, but I also don't see the immediate need for it.  That
is probably because I haven't followed the whole load-path idea
discussion closely.

So, I'd like to not put this into 1.8 and wait until more than the
"first minimal step" is available and then consider whether to put it
into the 1.8 series at that point.

Ok?

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405