[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch
From: |
Kevin Ryde |
Subject: |
Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:29:49 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>
> The difference is that the enclosing call approach allows
> code inbetween the lazy-catch and the error point to decide on a
> different, more local strategy for handling the error, whereas the
> hook approach doesn't. I think it's clear that the enclosing call
> approach is better,
Yes. Making a local decision is what I always seem to use lazy-catch
for, in my case trapping selected system call errors but not
interfering with the backtrace of others.
> the lazy-catch doc says that its handler must not return,
It'd be nice if that could be relaxed, if it was easy to do. In a
couple of places I've wanted to return and continue past the
lazy-catch form, having taken whatever action in the handler. (An
extra wrapping full `catch' makes that possible.)
- Re: No way out., (continued)
- Re: No way out., Neil Jerram, 2006/01/02
- Backtrace and enhanced catch, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/04
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/14
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Marius Vollmer, 2006/01/22
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/23
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Marius Vollmer, 2006/01/24
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/01/16
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/18
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/01/19
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/21
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch,
Kevin Ryde <=
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/27
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Kevin Ryde, 2006/01/31