|
From: | Ken Raeburn |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Improved `scm_from_locale_symbol ()' + `scm_take_locale_symbol ()' |
Date: | Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:27:42 -0500 |
On Jan 24, 2006, at 16:06, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
In article <address@hidden>, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:address@hidden (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes:Yes, -- FWIW, I warmly recommend darcs, which is much easier to use.I don't think there's such a huge difference, especially when looking at[0]. Additionally, most of the commands shown there now have"easy-looking" counterparts taken from Bazaar, e.g., `branch', `switch',etc. Both Arch and Darcs are easy to administrate and deploy.Anyway, if we were to choose a DRCS for Guile, I think it'd make senseto favor the GNU implementation.This is offtopic, but I think that this is kind of politically motivated reasoning is not in GUILE's best interests.
The FSF is now running an arch server at savannah, see http:// arch.sv.gnu.org for info.
As for the politics, you may have noticed that GNU is a somewhat politically motivated project... :-) But I have no idea if the choice of arch is official, or just what some volunteers were willing to support; ask RMS if you want to know the official position. (Personally, my preference would be svn, which I'm using at work, and svk for associated distributed work, but whatever....)
Ken
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |