[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No way out.
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: No way out. |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Jan 2006 19:58:07 +0000 (UTC) |
In article <address@hidden>,
Neil Jerram <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> If you intend to look at this, then I can try to isolate it to a
>> smaller case.
>
>Yes, please; I'm keen to understand this. Or I can work from the
>Lilypond code, if you can suggest a point to start from (such as where
>the error occurs that you want backtrace for).
For starters, we could figure out why --debug doesn't work. This is
for a current CVS GUILE
muurbloem:~/src/lilypond$ cat g.scm
(define (f x)
(display "HI")
zapp)
(define (g x)
(x))
(g f)
muurbloem:~/src/lilypond$ guile --debug g.scm
ERROR: Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure f (x)>
muurbloem:~/src/lilypond$ guile g.scm
ERROR: Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure f (x)>
muurbloem:~/src/lilypond$ guile
(guile>
(load "g.scm")
Backtrace:
In unknown file:
?: 0* [primitive-load "g.scm"]
In g.scm:
11: 1* [g #<procedure f (x)>]
7: 2 [f]
g.scm:7:3: In procedure f in expression (x):
g.scm:7:3: Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure f (x)>
ABORT: (wrong-number-of-args)
guile>
- Re: No way out., Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/01/01
- Message not available
- Re: No way out.,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: No way out., Neil Jerram, 2006/01/02
- Re: No way out., Neil Jerram, 2006/01/02
- Backtrace and enhanced catch, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/04
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/14
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Marius Vollmer, 2006/01/22
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/23
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Marius Vollmer, 2006/01/24
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/01/16
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Neil Jerram, 2006/01/18
- Re: Backtrace and enhanced catch, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/01/19