Re: [PATCH] `any' and `every' in `(oop goops util)'

[Neil Jerram]

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> (oop goops util) is not meant to be used outside the goops
>> implementation.  I'd rather not touch it for cosmetic purposes
>> only... :-)
>
> Sure, but why re-implement a subset of SRFI-1 in there, especially
> non-tail-recursive variants?

Couldn't we then remove any and every from util.scm, and change
goops.scm to use (srfi srfi-1)?  This will catch anyone who has used
(oop goops util) to get any/every, but that's an odd thing to do and
we can cover it in a NEWS item.

Regards,
        Neil