Re: [PATCH] Augmenting the doc of `define-module'

[Ludovic Courtès]

Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:

> No, I'm not bothered about the rationale, I just think "what-if"'s
> about builtin stuff is confusing.  Create a standalone example and
> it's fine.

The suggestion that I made implicitly was to "fix" srfi-19.scm so that
it "replaces" `current-time' instead of exporting it.  Once this is
done, the example I chose will fit well---and using this particular
example removes the need to describe a whole new stand-alone example,
and it's also clearer because real.

I guess if you were not bothered about the rationale you would just
agree that we should use `#:replace' in the modules I pointed out and
you would happily commit the whole thing.  ;-)

Thanks,
Ludovic.