Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #2

[Neil Jerram]

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Following your concern (I mean the performance concern, not the
> "marginal benefit" concern), I thought of another way to achieve the
> same thing, a bit more generic and slightly better performance-wise
> (patch attached). [...]

Thanks for taking my considerations into account and producing this
update.  My gut feel is that I do like this new patch better, but I'd
like to think about it more.  I also need to go back and finish my
draft reply to your previous email - I'll try to do that in the next
day or so.

Also, do you have docs for guile-reader up somewhere?

      Neil