[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: list versus apply
From: |
Kevin Ryde |
Subject: |
Re: list versus apply |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jun 2005 06:37:20 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
>
> (define (list . args) args)
>
> is an acceptable definition of list. Is it not?
Yep, because args is of course a fresh list when calling a lambda, but
it looks like primitives (C code) aren't called with a copied list
like that.
(I guess having primitives like that makes some sense, only a few are
interested in modifying or re-using their input "rest" list.)