Re: doc rx regexps

[Neil Jerram]

Julian Graham wrote:
> Yeah, I noticed this too, while I was looking for a lexer tool for
> Guile and came across the old (lang lex) module.  (lang lex) is pretty
> straightforward, but relies, I think, on some procedures from Rx that
> transform regular expressions to DFAs.  Any chance we can re-obtain
> some lexing / parsing Guile modules at some point in the future?  (I
> was setting about re-writing the DFA portions of Rx in pure Scheme --
> the original just exposed some C functions).

FWIW, I'd like this too (but have no plans in the forseeable future to 
implement it).  How far off (or rotted) is the guile-rgx-ctax code in 
Guile CVS - does anyone know?

        Neil