|
From: | Dirk Herrmann |
Subject: | Re: GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode) |
Date: | Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:06:19 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030821 |
Marius Vollmer wrote:
Why scm_is_eq instead of scm_eq_p? Are you proposing to rename _all_ predicates to scm_is_?If you really want to check for #t, you should use 'eq?', I'd say: scm_is_eq (x, SCM_BOOL_T)
Best regards, Dirk
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |