Re: doc srfi-4

[Marius Vollmer]

Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:

> I think the srfi-4 docs would be clearer with each available function
> named explicitly.  I know it's a bit repetitive, but seeing TAGvector?
> etc means you have to look for what TAG means, and also means emacs
> info-look won't work.
>
> I also think the separate sections for read syntax and the procedures
> can be combined, the whole is still pretty short.

Agreed!  Thanks!

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405