guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: guile-core in Arch archive [was: Patches from ttn's tree to Guile CV


From: Clinton Ebadi
Subject: Re: guile-core in Arch archive [was: Patches from ttn's tree to Guile CVS]
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 17:34:01 -0500
User-agent: KMail/1.5.9

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 06 March 2004 12:17, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> First, I'm happy to announce the availibility of an Arch "mirror" of
> the Guile CVS. It's located at:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~rotty/arch/address@hidden/guile-2004/
>
> In the category guile-core, there is a cvs-trunk branch, which will
> follow CVS HEAD. I might one day start auto-building Debian packages
> for experimental from that (and maybe other branches).
>       patch-2
>          Applied extended -e patch by Clinton Ebadi
>
>       patch-3
>          Applied getopt-long patch by Clinton Ebadi

You may want to undo the extended -e patch; I had forgotten that Guile CVS now 
reads the argument to -e and the (@ (module) procedure) syntax provides an 
easy enough way to do things. Maybe ttn's extended syntax could be supported 
with another option (-m?) or somehow supported by -e for compatibility with 
his 1.4.1.x tree (I don't really see how that would work, since (foo bar) 
could be a procedure call that returns the entry procedure).

> You might consider branching off that and I'll star-merge your changes
> back in, which lowers effort for both off us (just make sure you
> commit clean changesets, as you've done now).

Never a better time than the present to learn how to use arch.

- -- 
http://unknownlamer.org
AIM:unknownlamer IRC:address@hidden
I use Free Software because I value freedom over features.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAT5fqdgGh8PQDV0sRAoC5AKDJrLOp5Z+oyS1Ofk7NeFvlTz7oLwCfY7pi
D9MSbKdHrCbq6OLVxDj1fcI=
=vwHk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]