[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doco srfi-1 delete, delete-duplicates
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: doco srfi-1 delete, delete-duplicates |
Date: |
Tue, 13 May 2003 11:25:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 09:26:58PM -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I was sorely tempted to change the "=" formal parameter to something
> > like "eproc", to avoid any chance of it being confused with the core
> > "=" procedure. But if that's to be done then I suppose it should be
> > throughout the chapter, not just in one node.
>
> Same temptation here. Perhaps cmp, or comparison, or cmp-func...
Cmp is good (since, as the example shows, it's not just about some
kind of equality). Pred or predicate might be a candidate as well.
(but I like cmp best).
Regards
-- tomas
- doco srfi-1 delete, delete-duplicates, Kevin Ryde, 2003/05/12
- Re: doco srfi-1 delete, delete-duplicates, Rob Browning, 2003/05/12
- Re: doco srfi-1 delete, delete-duplicates,
tomas <=
- Re: doco srfi-1 delete, delete-duplicates, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2003/05/13
- Re: doco srfi-1 delete, delete-duplicates, tomas, 2003/05/13
- Re: doco srfi-1 delete, delete-duplicates, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2003/05/13
- Re: doco srfi-1 delete, delete-duplicates, tomas, 2003/05/14
- Re: doco srfi-1 delete, delete-duplicates, Kevin Ryde, 2003/05/15
- Re: doco srfi-1 delete, delete-duplicates, Paul Jarc, 2003/05/15