[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc organization (Re: Around again, and docs lead role)
From: |
Wolfgang Jaehrling |
Subject: |
Re: Doc organization (Re: Around again, and docs lead role) |
Date: |
Thu, 8 May 2003 23:18:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:21:12AM -0500, Rob Browning wrote:
> Of course there would be a lot of duplicated text between the sections
> since, for example, you'd have to document scm_list_p and list? in
> separate sections with essentially the same text.
Maintaining redundancy is no fun. But I don't think it is necessary
here, just generate both versions from the same input. (Preferably
embedding the information in - and extracting it from - the source
code.)
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
- Doc organization (Re: Around again, and docs lead role), Ricard Mira, 2003/05/03
- Re: Doc organization (Re: Around again, and docs lead role), Neil Jerram, 2003/05/08
- Re: Doc organization (Re: Around again, and docs lead role), Rob Browning, 2003/05/08
- Re: Doc organization (Re: Around again, and docs lead role),
Wolfgang Jaehrling <=
- Re: Doc organization (Re: Around again, and docs lead role), Neil Jerram, 2003/05/08
- Re: Doc organization (Re: Around again, and docs lead role), Rob Browning, 2003/05/08
- Re: Doc organization (Re: Around again, and docs lead role), David Van Horn, 2003/05/09
- Re: Doc organization (Re: Around again, and docs lead role), Neil Jerram, 2003/05/10
- Re: Doc organization (Re: Around again, and docs lead role), Rob Browning, 2003/05/15
- Re: Doc organization (Re: Around again, and docs lead role), Paul Jarc, 2003/05/15
Re: Doc organization (Re: Around again, and docs lead role), Max Techter, 2003/05/08