Re: r5rs pitfall test

[Marius Vollmer]

[You'd never think you get an answer this late, right? ;-]

"Dale P. Smith" <address@hidden> writes:

> I saw this on comp.lang.scheme and thought I'd try it out:
> 
> http://sisc.sourceforge.net/r5rspitresults.html

Thanks!  I added these tests to the HEAD test suite.

> Guile fails tests 1.1 and 2.1

I didn't fix these bugs right away since I didn't understand 1.1 right
away and 2.1 is relatively hard to fix, given the internal structure
of our evaluator.  I'd say 2.1 (at least) isn't very important to fix,
tho.

If anyone feels motivated... :-)

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405