|
| From: | Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
| Subject: | Re: Auto(conf|make) style questions |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Mar 2003 21:17:17 +0100 |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "tomas" == tomas <address@hidden> writes: [...] >> NEON_COMPAT="$NEON_COMPAT scm_c_string2str.lo" tomas> ^^^^ EEEK! ;-) [...] tomas> If I understand the configury documentation correctly -- isn't using tomas> explicit dynamic object endings a ``Don't Do That?'' and exactly what tomas> $(LIBOBJS) or $(LTLIBOBJS) is supposed to handle for you? For .lo is tomas> platform specific... No. `.lo' is portable. What wasn't portable in the way people used to define LTLIBOBJS from LIBOBJS was the hardcoding of `.o'. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |