guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Any opposition to changing share/guile/X.Y.Z to share/guile/X.Y?


From: Rob Browning
Subject: Re: Any opposition to changing share/guile/X.Y.Z to share/guile/X.Y?
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:40:20 -0600
User-agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu)

Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

> Assuming you mean micro, this sounds OK to me.  My understanding is
> that the API doesn't change within a stable series, so not allowing
> multiple revisions to be installed at the same time makes sense.

Yeah, sorry, I'm getting the libtool nomenclature and our nomenclature
confused.  I meant micro in our terms, revision in theirs -- that's
why I said "minor revision" which was quite confusing for those
actually paying attention :>

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]