[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: illegal uses of define in guile
From: |
rm |
Subject: |
Re: illegal uses of define in guile |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:33:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.24i |
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 08:15:17AM +0200, Dirk Herrmann wrote:
> [...]
> I wonder what people's objective is when they use these constructs? Do
> you really want to construct two different top-level environments, where
> once the symbol has a definition and once it has not? Are you (mis)using
> the definedness of a symbol as a means to communicate boolean values?
>
> Do other scheme implementations allow this?
>
Just a short testrun:
drscheme - no
elk - yes
scheme48 - no
kali - no
stalin - no
bigloo - yes
Greetings
Ralf Mattes
> Best regards
> Dirk Herrmann
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Guile-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
Re: illegal uses of define in guile, rm, 2002/10/15
Re: illegal uses of define in guile, Marius Vollmer, 2002/10/18