Re: 1.6.0: major soname version decremented?

[Rob Browning]

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes:

> Yes, I did for Cygwin.  I expect no big problems, though.

Naughty, naughty.  (No wonder we were hearing complaints about guile
being too unstable for LilyPond.) :>

>> Nope.  I knew it would decrease the major number, I just didn't think
>> it would matter.  If this *is* in fact a big problem, please explain,
>> and we'll figure out what should be done about it.
>
> No, I think we'll be fine.  Cygwin now has an old libguile14, and a
> newer libguile12 package.  By the time that we'll see a new libguile14
> package it will get a higher version number than the old one, and the
> old one will be replaced automatically.

OK, good.  Feel free to raise the issue again if this turns out to be
more serious.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD