Re: 1.5.8 "make check" on powerpc

[Dirk Herrmann]

On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Dirk Herrmann wrote:

> > I believe that the error is that the object is in fact collected, when
> > it should not have been. At least, that's what I gather from the message.
> 
> No, the test names are fomulated to describe the successfull case:
>   "(+ 1 2) gives 2",
> which sounds right when read as:
>   PASS: "(+ 1 2) gives 2"
> or
>   FAIL: "(+ 1 2) gives 2"
> 
> Best regards,
> Dirk

Well, funny.  Who is that guy that wrote this last message?  Could we ban
him from the list for writing up such nonsense ?  ;-)

Please, stop rolling on the floor and simply replace
  "(+ 1 2) gives 2"
by
  "(+ 1 1) gives 2"

Thanks for being mercyful with me.
Dirk