[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :export vs. define-public
From: |
Eric E Moore |
Subject: |
Re: :export vs. define-public |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Sep 2002 18:54:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.2 |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> Eric E Moore <address@hidden> writes:
> Actually, I tend to like (export foo) better, but either way I agree,
> :export and (export foo) make it possible to have a common source file
> that you share between different scheme implementations.
I like (export foo) better too. Just the original thread was
:export vs define-public. Since :export and (export) serve similar
purposes, I'd be happy to see one of the two go, but would like to see
at least one kept.
--
Eric E. Moore
pgpNXRIv3NFLe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: :export vs. define-public, (continued)
- Re: :export vs. define-public, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/09/04
- cvs access broken?, Tom Lord, 2002/09/04
- Re: :export vs. define-public, Tom Lord, 2002/09/04
- Re: :export vs. define-public, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/09/04
- Re: :export vs. define-public, Tom Lord, 2002/09/04
- Re: :export vs. define-public, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/09/04
- Re: :export vs. define-public, Tom Lord, 2002/09/04
Re: :export vs. define-public, Eric E Moore, 2002/09/05