Re: Threads and asyncs

[Thomas Bushnell, BSG]

Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:

> Common Lisp and Emacs Lisp have SCM's behavior.

No, Common Lisp and Emacs Lisp have (eq '() nil) -> t.

> A while back I tried to flame the current guile developers into
> submission on this point, but they are resiliant against such attacks.
> The "restart old fights" bit is in reference to that flame war -- it's
> just me obsequiously mentioning the design issue in a hopefully
> neutral way.

Perhaps they didn't submit, but rather actually *agreed* with the R5RS
editors.

Or is that just totally impossible??