guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?)


From: Dale P. Smith
Subject: Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?)
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 18:37:30 -0400

On 13 Aug 2002 02:40:28 +0200
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> wrote:

> Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > address@hidden writes:
> > 
> > > Should this be documented soon?
> > 
> > Will do.
> 
> Done.  Please have a look.  (In CVS HEAD.)

Looks good, but there should be @var{} around the actual names of the
arguments, for example:

@deftypefn {C Procedure} SCM scm_c_define_module (const char *name, void 
(*init) (void *), void *data)

Should be:

@deftypefn {C Procedure} SCM scm_c_define_module (const char address@hidden, 
void (address@hidden) (void *), void address@hidden)

I've found that you can force texinfo to do line breaks between arguments for 
long winded functions if you surround them with {}.

@deftypefn {C Procedure} SCM scm_c_define_module ({const char address@hidden,} 
{void (address@hidden) (void *),} {void address@hidden)


-Dale



-- 
Dale P. Smith
Senior Systems Consultant,      | Treasurer,
Altus Technologies Corporation  | Cleveland Linux Users Group
address@hidden            | http://cleveland.lug.net
440-746-9000 x339               |




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]