[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Smart variables, dumb variables
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: Smart variables, dumb variables |
Date: |
15 Aug 2002 18:36:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
address@hidden writes:
> It sure makes sense, but at another point (see also all the other
> followups). Those decisions are compile-time, and whether the
> compiler gets its info from promises the user makes (kind of
> type declarations) or from static code analysis -- it'd have
> to have a richer per-variable data structure than just those two
> bits.
Yes, but some parts of that data structure could be moved into the
variable cell, especially those that would be used right from the
start by our current memoizer.
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, (continued)
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Neil Jerram, 2002/08/19
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/19
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/20
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/26
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, tomas, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables,
Marius Vollmer <=
Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Rob Browning, 2002/08/14
Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Rob Browning, 2002/08/14