[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Smart variables, dumb variables
From: |
Lynn Winebarger |
Subject: |
Re: Smart variables, dumb variables |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Aug 2002 03:01:57 -0500 |
On Thursday 15 August 2002 03:06, address@hidden wrote:
>
> In the presence of a generic method system (i.e. function dispatch on
> the type signature of the arguments) this seems to be rather non-trivial,
> or do you want to propose to make guile a strongly typed language ?
Scheme is strongly typed. It's just not statically typed. Two different
things.
Lynn
- Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/13
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, tomas, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, tomas, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables,
Lynn Winebarger <=
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Rob Browning, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Neil Jerram, 2002/08/19
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/19