[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: port initialization?
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: port initialization? |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Aug 2002 01:07:46 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > We could have a scm_add_to_port_table() that returns an SCM, that
> > would be less error prone
>
> That SCM would be the port cell, right? That would be cleaner, yes.
OK. Changed it. Should we have a compatibility function? (i.e. is the
old scm_add_to_port_table part of the public C interface of guile?)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen
- Re: port initialization?, (continued)
- Re: port initialization?, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/08/08
- Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/08/09
- Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/10
- Re: port initialization?, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/08/10
- Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/11
Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/08/08