Re: GC rewrite, first version.

[Rob Browning]

Han-Wen <address@hidden> writes:

> * I've split gc.c in a lot of files, and a private header file. The
>   formerly static functions are now exported, but with the scm_ prefix
>
>   I think the prefix scm_i_ is utterly unreadable.  I decided against
>   using it.  The header file is not `exported' so that should make it
>   clear that the structures are internal.

I believe there was a discussion about this a while back, and although
I'm fine with the idea of private headers (in fact, I tend to think
that from the end-user's perspective they may be a bit cleaner), that
wasn't the consensus.  People preferred the scm_i_ approach.

So while in general I'm not conceptually opposed to private headers
instead of the scm_i_ prefix, I think whatever we do we should do it
consistently.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD