[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compilation
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: compilation |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:04:09 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) |
Bill Schottstaedt <address@hidden> writes:
> and I'm swamped (as is everyone) with other things to do, so a big
> project to do it right doesn't resonate. But, maybe I'd get seduced
> into helping once it got started.
:>
At the moment Marius' arguments that we should clean up guile's
execution model with an eye toward future "compilation" before we dive
back in to any particular strategy sound pretty good to me.
I have this suspicion that if this is done right (with hooks in
suitable places and well defined semantics) then it might make it a
lot easier to try out various approaches. However, without more
investigation, it's possible that I'm just falling victim to wishful
thinking.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD
- compilation, Bill Schottstaedt, 2002/04/23
- Re: compilation,
Rob Browning <=