Re: Syntax checks

[Marius Vollmer]

Lynn Winebarger <address@hidden> writes:

>     Maybe there should be some way (for development purposes) to 
> re-expand macros, but I don't believe it should be the default semantics 
> - or even  that it should supported in normal use (i.e. without an evaluator
> option being flipped on somewhere).  In particular, any compiler generated
> code should not be required to support it without specially requesting that 
> support.

I say we should support it by making sure reloading of files (source
or compiled) behaves sanely in general.  People who want their changed
macro definitions to take effect can then reload or recompile the
affected code.