[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Regarding (bug "versioning-of-extensions")
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: Regarding (bug "versioning-of-extensions") |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:49:42 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> Unless there are objections, I think I'm going to leave the number
> alone, i.e. use 15, even though due to AGE the actual lib major
> version might be smaller, for example 13, but I'll change the naming
> scheme like this
>
> libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-lt15
Actually, I decided to go with the most explicit
libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-lt-15-0-2.so.X.Y.Z
This means that people won't have to guess which number the "lt"
number is -- it's just the actual libtool var numbers
CURRENT-REVISION-AGE (which are the only ones we can determine
programatically), and it also means that if someone wanted to, they
could, given a set of libfoo libs named this way, apply the same
algorithm that libtool uses to figure out which, if any, satisfies a
given interface -- i.e. doesn't hurt, might help :>
As before, let me know if you see a problem.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD
- Re: Regarding (bug "versioning-of-extensions"),
Rob Browning <=