Re: Handling BUGS.

[Rob Browning]

Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:

> I don't think bugs need numbers, just no-bugs-database should be
> enough.

On second thought, I completely agree that just having one set of
files is a better idea, though if the bugs database keeps growing, we
might need to archive older stuff at some point -- that's all I was
really thinking of.  However there are probably much better ways to
handle that.

However I *am* a little hesitant about the free-form bug/file-names,
but since I'm having trouble figuring out exactly why that worries me,
we'll just ignore me for now :>

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD