Re: Handling BUGS.

[Rob Browning]

Evan Prodromou <address@hidden> writes:

> Well, then, if that's the case, I'd say go for it.
>
> HOWEVER, it seems that perhaps maintaining the current bug file format
> (except, of course, splitting up bugs between files) might get one
> "there" faster than hoping for -- or hacking on -- an RFC822 parser.

Right, as a first pass, I just wanted to split the files based on the
^L chars and start with that.

I also felt like this could be done pretty independently of the
release, and in fact, I wasn't planning to work on any of this myself
anytime soon.  It just seemed like a good idea.  (Editing two files
with the same bug with different numbers is something I'm very likely
to screw up.)

When I get ready to release, I either include the current BUGS file,
or the one from guile-bugs, depending on which one exists, and is
more correct :>

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD