Re: Handling BUGS.

[Neil Jerram]

>>>>> "Rob" == Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

    Rob> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
    >> All sounds good to me, but how do we indicate that a bug has been
    >> fixed in one tree but not in another?

    Rob> Just change it's "affects:" field.  i.e. you could have

    Rob>   affects: 1.4 1.6 1.7

    Rob> and when it's fixed in 1.6, just delete it from the line.  The only
    Rob> time a bug would move to resolved is if it's been fixed in *all*
    Rob> trees.  In this first, fairly simplistic approach, I mostly just
    Rob> figured resolved as a place old bugs go to die to at least *somewhat*
    Rob> reduce the inevitable clutter we'll have in active.  In the long term,
    Rob> pumping this stuff into postgres via guile-pg or similar may be the
    Rob> way to go, but that's a problem for our future selves :>

That sounds fine.

        Neil