Re: api differences between 1.4 and 1.6

[Rob Browning]

Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

> If we agree that this is a good idea, we could start introducing it in
> 1.5/1.6, even though 1.5/1.6 don't currently have SCM_API.  (SCM_API
> can be useful as a marker even if it macros to nothing.)

This sounds like an excellent idea, though I have some vague (possibly
misguided) recollection we'd discussed a plan for cleaning up the API
more generally -- did we?  -- if so does this fit in with that?

Sorry for being so vague -- hopefully if I'm not just hallucinating,
this will jog someone's memory.

Thanks

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD