Re: pre-inst-guile

[Rob Browning]

Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:

> you don't need to do "make install" to use pre-inst-guile (hence its
> name and existence!)...

No, I know.  I was commenting on why I wanted something like
pre-inst-guile in the first place -- i.e. my original motivation.
pre-inst-guile looked like exactly what I wanted.

> yeah, tests that behave differently (in expected ways) before/after code
> changes are good tests.  some version control philosophies don't allow
> checkins w/o the associated test, but i can't see that happening for
> guile anytime soon.

Nope, but I'm planning to try and start moving in the direction of
more tests.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD