[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
nested define syntax
From: |
Dirk Herrmann |
Subject: |
nested define syntax |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:43:42 +0100 (MET) |
Hello,
currently, guile allows the following:
guile> (define (((foo a b) c) d) #f)
guile> foo
#<procedure foo (a b)>
guile> (procedure-source foo)
(lambda (a b) (lambda (c) (lambda (d) #f)))
This is non-R5RS conformant, and I wonder if anybody uses this style of
declaration? Shouldn't we rather remove it?
Best regards
Dirk Herrmann
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- nested define syntax,
Dirk Herrmann <=