Re: SCM_CARLOC and applications

[Michael Livshin]

Ken Raeburn <address@hidden> writes:

> If SCM_CARLOC is intended to be part of the interface for applications
> to use, it undermines my argument, which I thought was a good one :-),
> but makes my current Guile-Emacs changes a lot smaller...

if it was up to me, I would remove SCM_CARLOC from the public
interface (is it documented, BTW?  appears not to be).  it would
certainly have to be slow in the presence of a write barrier, etc.

-- 
Make sure your code does nothing gracefully.