Re: Issues holding up 1.6.0 release.

[Rob Browning]

Gary Houston <address@hidden> writes:

> I think we should experiment with Guppi and leave this stuff out of
> 1.6.
>
> The continuation barrier above has the strange property that
> exceptions can pass through, but escape continuations can not.  Since
> it seems that only reentry to the body needs to be prevented, maybe
> this would be sufficient:

So does this mean that I should just copy/paste the code from
continuations.c for 1.5 and modify it as guppi and scwm did for Guile
1.4?

i.e. Do we have a consensus that we should wait until post 1.6 to try
and create a no-unwind/rewind version?

Thanks

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD