Re: New NUM2INTEGRAL functions - unwanted polymorphism?

[Rob Browning]

Mikael Djurfeldt <address@hidden> writes:

> OK, removed.
>
> And I added a message about missing the inexact in the 1.6 release due
> to the changed behavior, as you suggested.
>
> For 1.7 I removed the clause completely.  If we later decide to give
> this kind of hint about what is expected, we should do it for all
> functions and all types.

I tried a make check, and it fails in srfi-19.

  ERROR: srfi-19.test: SRFI date/time library: #<procedure julian-day->date 
(jdn . tz-offset)> respects local DST if no TZ-OFFSET given - arguments: 
((wrong-type-arg "localtime" "Wrong type (inexact) argument in position ~A: ~S" 
(1 991396800.0) #f))
  ERROR: srfi-19.test: SRFI date/time library: #<procedure 
modified-julian-day->date (jdn . tz-offset)> respects local DST if no TZ-OFFSET 
given - arguments: ((wrong-type-arg "localtime" "Wrong type (inexact) argument 
in position ~A: ~S" (1 991396800.0) #f))

I suppose some of the math may be wrong in there.  I'll look in to it
when I get a chance, unless someone else beats me to it.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD