[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated
|
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
|
Subject: |
Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated |
|
Date: |
06 Sep 2001 02:14:39 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.102 |
stefan <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello list !
>
> Working on the Win32 port of Guile for future release I noticed long_long
> and ulong_long being deprecated. Could anyone explain it ?
The idea is that libguile itself does not need a "long long" type, but
provides support for it (in the form of conversion functions, say)
when it is available.
In what way is this causing you problems, exactly?
Is "int64_t" standard? Is it always the same as "long long", or would
"long long" on a 64bit platform be 128 bits?
- long_long and ulong_long deprecated, stefan, 2001/09/01
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, Rob Browning, 2001/09/01
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, stefan, 2001/09/06
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, Marius Vollmer, 2001/09/06
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, stefan, 2001/09/06
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, Rob Browning, 2001/09/06
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, stefan, 2001/09/07
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, Rob Browning, 2001/09/07
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, stefan, 2001/09/07
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, Rob Browning, 2001/09/07
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, stefan, 2001/09/08
- Re: long_long and ulong_long deprecated, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/09/15