[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general).
|
From: |
Matthias Koeppe |
|
Subject: |
Re: Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general). |
|
Date: |
Thu, 23 Aug 2001 17:30:40 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.6 |
Miroslav Silovic <address@hidden> writes:
> Matthias Koeppe <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I would like to add some GOOPS support for SWIG (making GOOPS
>> "shadow classes" for C structs and C++ classes), but I definitely
>> need help here since I don't do C++ and have never seriously worked
>> with GOOPS.
>
> As far as I could tell, any smob you define is automatically a GOOPS
> class.
Indeed, but the automatically generated GOOPS classes are pretty
trivial ones. Proper GOOPS support would mean that struct/class
members are turned into virtual slots of GOOPS classes and member
functions into GOOPS methods.
--
Matthias Köppe -- http://www.math.uni-magdeburg.de/~mkoeppe
- Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general)., Rob Browning, 2001/08/20
- Re: Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general)., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/08/20
- Re: Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general)., Alex Shinn, 2001/08/20
- Re: Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general)., Matthew, 2001/08/20
- Re: Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general)., Miroslav Silovic, 2001/08/21
- Re: Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general)., Matthias Koeppe, 2001/08/23