Re: release push

[Rob Browning]

Martin Grabmueller <address@hidden> writes:

> I had a look, and the descriptions look complete.  The deprecation
> mechanism has worked for me until now.  So I would simply mark this
> point as done.  Objections?

Fine with me, but I don't know enough about the issue to be
athoritative.

>   - Fact-check INSTALL. (rlb: INSTALL looks pretty good to me, but can
>     someone make sure that in the "Using Guile without installing it"
>     section, we don't need to mention setting LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH or
>     LD_LIBRARY_PATH.)
> 
> In the attached diff I have added a note about setting
> LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH when using the SRFI modules.  If there are no
> objections, I'll commit it.

That sounds good.

I'm also in the process of hacking on RELEASE and HACKING.  These
needed major updates, but I'm about half way done.

> Done.  Looks pretty good.  In addition, I have corrected some
> descriptions, information and file lists (see the diff.)
> 
>   - Reformat the names in THANKS.
> 
> What does that mean?

Not sure - I would just take it to mean we should make sure it looks
OK.

> ===File ~/cvs/guile-core-stable-1.5/diff====================
> Index: INSTALL
> ===================================================================

Those look pretty good to me, though I'm not as good at reading
non-context diffs quickly, and I didn't have a long time to look at
it.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD