[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `angle' implementation
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: `angle' implementation |
Date: |
03 Jul 2001 10:04:24 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:
> excuse me for butting in at this point, but I understand that you,
> Thomas, are actually _hired_ by the FSF to do Guile-related things.
Specifically for one summer. A task that can be actually completed in
that time is important. :)
> why writing a Python translator, of all things?
It's part of the very important original design of Guile and one which
has been essentially ignored by most Guile hackers. It's also a
reasonably well contained task.
And, the time to suggest *other* tasks is long past; you should have
suggested something months ago and not now. :)
> the reason I ask is because I think Guile is in need of a paid person
> taking care of the plumbing. in absence of such, really important
> things get depeloped (or discussed) up to the "boring" stage and stay
> there. I mean things like a functioning compiler or a nicer module
> system.
I'm not a permament employee, and I'm not interested in taking on a
long-term maintenance task like that.
> please don't take it personally (I rarely intend things to be
> personal, but my experience is that they are frequently taken as such.
> please don't), I'm just extremely curious about the FSF's motivation.
I wrote RMS, I said "I'd like to work on this". At the same time, I
wrote to Guile mailing lists and said "I'd like to work on this". RMS
said "fine" and folks on the Guile lists said "cool".
Thomas