Re: SCM_CALL_N

[Keisuke Nishida]

At Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:04:53 +0200 (MEST),
Dirk Herrmann wrote:
> 
> What about the idea to provide scm_listify as scm_list_n, used as
>   scm_list_n (arg1, arg2, ..., SCM_UNDEFINED)
> ?  Note that we can't name it scm_list, because of name conflicts.  But,
> it may be a good idea to use `n´ as a postfix anyway.

Looks nice.  Okay, how many functions do we want?  In libguile,
the following number of macros (+ a function) are used:

  SCM_LIST0:    0
  SCM_LIST1:   79
  SCM_LIST2:   41
  SCM_LIST3:   39
  SCM_LIST4:    8
  SCM_LIST5:    6
  SCM_LIST6:    0
  SCM_LIST7:    0
  SCM_LIST8:    0
  SCM_LIST9:    0
  scm_listify:  6

Do we want scm_list_0 to scm_list_9 anyway?

Keisuke