Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t

[Jacques A. Vidrine]

On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 01:49:09AM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > and make scm_t_bits an unsigned type.
> 
> Err, what was the reason again for making scm_t_bits unsigned?
> 
> I just realized that we need a signed version anyway for fixnum
> fiddling.

union scm_word {
        unsigned long    tag;
        void            *ptr;
        long             sl;
        unsigned long    ul;
};

or something?
-- 
Jacques Vidrine / address@hidden / address@hidden / address@hidden