Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t

[Jacques A. Vidrine]

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 02:46:06AM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Thanks!  We'll make it so!
> 
> I think we should have
> 
>     typedef uintptr_t scm_t_bits;
>     typedef intptr_t scm_t_length;
>     typedef uintptr_t scm_t_ulength;

What are  these for, exactly (sorry  for the dumb question)?   If they
are used for  storing /pointers/, I'd stick with the  standard name --
call a spade a  spade.  If they are used for  something else, I wonder
if u?inptr_t is the right type to use after all.

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques Vidrine / address@hidden / address@hidden / address@hidden