Re: feature request

[Michael Livshin]

Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:

> Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Another very interesting issue came up in a private discussion with
> > Michael:  When giving the compile time option -W in addition to -Wall to
> > gcc, it will display quite some more usefull warning messages.  Among them
> > are empty if blocks (helped me to fix a bug in ramap.c), comparisons of
> > unsigned values against >= 0 (which is always true and thus indicates a
> > potential signedness problem), and comparisons of signed against unsigned
> > variables.  From the latter there are still quite a lot remaining, but I
> > guess it doesn't make much sense to check them before we make scm_bits_t
> > into an unsigned type.
> 
> want to make -W be part of the default CFLAGS?

er.  duh.  sorry, I read the above faster than my still-sleeping brain
could digest it, apparently.

-- 
Our users will know fear and cower before our software. Ship it! Ship
it and let them flee like the dogs they are!
                                        -- Klingon Programmer