Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.

[Rob Browning]

Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:

> the Guile tarball is supposed to come with already-made configure
> script, isn't it?  so that the users who don't build from CVS don't
> care.

Right.

> I guess it can wait, then. ;) 

Well, it looks like I've fixed it, and since as you point out, only
the developers will need autoconf 2.50, then I'm tempted to go ahead
and update us.  Any objections?

> a related question: do you consider the current snarfer situation
> (that it's written in AWK and refuses to work on most of the non-Linux
> platforms) as critical?

I'm new enough to the code base that I actually don't even really know
much about the snarfer, but I've been planning to look in to the
broader process a bit soon.  I presume it's the program involved in
making the .x files...

So I'm the wrong person to answer that :>

-- 
Rob Browning <address@hidden> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930