[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: read'ing/write'ing strings, and escape sequences
From: |
Jacques A. Vidrine |
Subject: |
Re: read'ing/write'ing strings, and escape sequences |
Date: |
Fri, 25 May 2001 11:30:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 02:13:04AM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> "Jacques A. Vidrine" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > This is actually two tightly coupled proposals.
>
> Wouldn't this make a nice SRFI?
Perhaps, after some discussion about which strategy that I mentioned
is appropriate. My understanding is that SRFIs should be complete
strategies for implementation, rather than for discussion. I may not
have outlined the options clearly enough to generate discussion. I'll
re-cap them here:
. Make the described behavior [1] the default
. Turn on the described behavior using a new read-option (and
possibly create and use `write-options')
. Forget about read/write and supply new string-specific functions
to implement the described behavior, e.g. `read-ansi-c-string',
`write-ansi-c-string' (I find this less useful than the other
possibilities, of course)
Hmm, or maybe your suggestion is that the behavior be turned on by
using Guile's SRFI mechanism (which I'm not familiar with, but am
vaguely aware something exists)?
Cheers,
--
Jacques Vidrine / address@hidden / address@hidden / address@hidden
[1] See Message-ID <address@hidden> on the
guile-devel mailing list for the `described behavior'