Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?

[Marius Vollmer]

Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:

> Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > BTW, roots for gc would also allow us to get rid of the scm_sys_protects
> > array and thus allow to put the corresponding definitions at the places
> > where they belong.
> 
> I'll implement it, then.  (tomorrow, probably).

Thanks!
 
> some questions:
> 
> should I make scm_register_root nest like scm_protect?

Yes, I'd say so.

Should the roots be scanned conservatively or precisely?  I'm in favor
of "precisely".